Added: Dakota Guinn - Date: 02.10.2021 03:14 - Views: 13421 - Clicks: 4101
Con radioactive dating can only be used to date fossils older than approximately 50, years old. Pro The half life of radioactive substances are empirically determined.
The ratio of the parent to daughter atoms can be used to determine an exact age given the assumptions that none of the original parent atoms have been eroded or lost during the time being calculated. Con All radioactive dating except Carbon 14 are based on atoms found in igneous rocks. Fossils are almost never found in igneous rocks. So radioactive dating can not be used to directly date fossils. The one exception is Carbon However Carbon 14 has a relatively short half life so it cannot be used on fossils much older than 50, years which makes it useful for anthropology but not geo history.
Also most fossils no longer contain Carbon they have been turned to stone. Radioactive dating gives hope for an objective empirical method of determining the age of fossils. But because of the likely hood of erosion and lack of direct application to fossils it doesn't work very well. What are the pros and cons of radioactive dating?
David Drayer. Mar 31, Pro radioactive dating gives an absolute age for the rocks dated.
Explanation: Pro The half life of radioactive substances are empirically determined. Related questions Why does carbon 14 undergo radioactive decay? How can half-life be described in terms of radioactive decay? What are some examples of radioisotopes? What are radioisotopes? What is half-life? What is radioactive carbon dating? How can carbon 14 be used in biology? How can carbon 14 be used to date organic material? How carbon 14 dating is done? How does carbon 14 decay? See all questions in Radioactive Carbon Dating. Impact of this question views around the world.
You can reuse this answer Creative Commons .Advantages and disadvantages of relative and radiometric dating
email: [email protected] - phone:(706) 913-9775 x 2799
Looking for sex tonight in your area?